Cancer has 3 main characteristics. All cancer cells are acidic in nature as the double Nobel prize laureate, Otto Warburg discovered way back in 1931. All cancer cells are hypoxic in nature ie lack of oxygen getting to the cells turning them into an acidic environment. Toxicity is the key to propagation of cancer cells into tumours which can also be considered a precursor to acidosis [ acid stress on our system ] and hypoxia.
The current medical insurance system is in fact an impediment to advances in cancer therapy, and there are no real interest in really finding a cure. Cancer related NGO’s are typically funded by big corporations that has a vested interest in cancer treatments – not a cure that doesn’t cost an absolute fortune. NGO’s charged with such objectives will be redundant as soon as a cure for cancer is found. Where is the incentive for that to happen ?
But you cannot disband an entire industry, and that is what it has become. It is now a cancer industry.
Did you know that even the simple PAP smear was opposed and left largely unused for some 25 years, as this inexpensive test would infringe on profits? Once the PAP smear finally did come into widespread use, mortality rates from cervical cancer dropped dramatically.
And so, the battle to suppress innovation rages on.
Today, there are a number of alternative cancer treatments that are vehemently suppressed and opposed, while bobble-heads talk about ‘doing everything we can to find a cure for cancer.
For example, there are multiple ways of keeping the body alkaline which appears to have remarkable potential as a cancer protocol. The reason it’s not available as an approved treatment for cancer is because it costs merely pennies a day, so no drug company wants to touch it. You probably couldn’t even break even after paying the $1 billion or so to get the approval… and this is the primary problem with the current cancer paradigm: Only patents make money, and if you can’t patent it because it’s a natural product, or if the treatment is not going to be exceedingly profitable, it will never see the light of day as an FDA approved cancer treatment. Nor will it be part of the standard of care.
In the previous article on balancing nutrition, we highlighted the importance on addressing mineral deficiency. We address an example of the need for magnesium for more than 300 enzyme actions. A mineral of such importance clearly illustrates that every aspect of health will be needed and requiring proper balancing to eliminate diseases and that includes eliminating cancer as well. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors.
I have listed 3 fundamental cancer facts above. In order to deal with cancer, one has to realize the implications of these fundamentals and many others. Typical blood tests for tumors are only about 70% accurate which means that there is a high chance of false positives and false negatives. They are not meant to be diagnostic and yet most medical practitioners will use these bio markers for such a purpose. Even if these markers accurately shows up as real positive, its already at stage 3 or 4 tumors.
Another fact is that all cancer tumors begin with a single cell. These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. There are much more accurate methods of testing available overseas which can detect tumours at a much earlier stage as well but hardly any practitioner uses that due to lack of enthusiasm or simply ignorance. From my experience with other blood markers, I can deduce that the latter is more accurate.
When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size. In the same way, standard tests designed for tumors does NOT mean there are no cancer cells. This also means that when standard blood test or scans shows the absence of any tumors, it does not mean that there are no cancer cells present.
I coached a 72 year old man with end stage prostate cancer with tumour at the spine surgically removed and bed ridden. The tumor has metastasized [ spread ] to his bones and even chemo has been ruled out by his doctor. Three months into his detoxification process, he faced the dilemma of following my nutritional advise of NOT consuming hospital grade chicken etc against his attending doctor of him needing such ‘protein for his recovery’.
He had no other options left to adopt from a standard allopathic approach when chemo has been ruled out. The gist of it is that he decided to follow my advise on nutrition and lifestyle intervention and his PSA levels [ prostate specific antigen as a standard collaborative marker for prostate cancer ] plummet from 147 to only 0.2 after 6 months of intensive coaching. It has been more than 2 years and from being bed ridden and with no further hope, he is now not only alive but mobile again.
Not all cancers require the same approach but this illustrates that typically patients are left with time tested nutrition and lifestyle when they have nowhere else to turn to. Imagine what the statistics would read like if such time tested approaches were adopted as a first approach rather than last resort.
This paradigm blocks those who can really help from doing so; it blocks progress, hinders innovation; limits personal choice; and sacrifices those who need not necessarily die—with death certificate that reads:
Cause of Death: Respiratory failure due to chronic toxicity of chemotherapy
After more than half century of war on cancer, that is where we are today. We will highlight on the standard of care treatment typically available next.